login / submit

International Journal of Medical Discoveries

ISSN: 3067-7912

The International Journal of Medical Discoveries (IJMD) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal dedicated to advancing the understanding, innovation, and application of medical science. Our mission is to serve as a platform for the dissemination of cutting-edge research and discoveries that shape the future of healthcare and important medical discoveries worldwide.

Article Views: 694

Clinical Decision-Making Variability Among Nurse Practitioners in the Early Detection and Management of Sepsis in Acute Care Settings

1Sufiyan Musa , 2Omid Moradi , 3*Mohammad ID Ibrahim , 4Farah Khir

1 Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Taif University

2 Department of Engineering, Islamic Azad University

3 D’Youville University, Advanced Practice Nursing

4 School of Physics and Material Sciences Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA

Received: 03-Dec-2025 | Revised: 24-Dec-2025 | Accepted: 29-Dec-2025

Download PDF (673)

Doi

https://doi.org/10.64220/ijmd.v2i1.006

Abstract

Sepsis remains a leading cause of hospital mortality worldwide, affecting approximately 48.9 million individuals annually. Early detection by nurse practitioners is crucial, yet variability in clinical judgment poses a significant threat to patient survival outcomes in acute care. The study aimed to examine the factors influencing clinical decision-making variability among nurse practitioners in early sepsis detection and management. A systematic literature review was conducted using PICO and SPIDER frameworks to analyze 40 core references from acute care settings. Data analysis followed a thematic approach to identify clinical, organizational, and individual drivers of decision variability. Findings indicated that each additional patient assigned to a nurse practitioner increased the risk of missed sepsis bundle tasks by 10%. Organizational constraints and clinical ambiguity led to adherence rates for international sepsis guidelines fluctuating between 45% and 82%. Automated clinical decision support systems were shown to improve early detection accuracy by 15% to 20% compared to manual assessment alone. Standardizing nurse practitioner reasoning through objective tools is essential to minimize the subjective variability currently observed in acute care settings.

Keywords

Sepsis; Nurse Practitioners; Clinical Decision-Making; Acute Care; Sepsis-3; Early Diagnosis; Patient Safety; Systematic Review

Cite this Article

APA Style

Musa, S., Moradi, O., Ibrahim, M., et al. (2025). Clinical Decision-Making Variability Among Nurse Practitioners in the Early Detection and Management of Sepsis in Acute Care Settings. *International Journal of Medical Discoveries, Volume 2 (2026)*(Issue 1), . https://doi.org/10.64220/ijmd.v2i1.006

MLA Style

Sufiyan Musa et al. "Clinical Decision-Making Variability Among Nurse Practitioners in the Early Detection and Management of Sepsis in Acute Care Settings." *International Journal of Medical Discoveries*, vol. Volume 2 (2026), no. Issue 1, 2025, pp. . https://doi.org/10.64220/ijmd.v2i1.006

Chicago Style

Sufiyan Musa, Omid Moradi, Mohammad ID Ibrahim, et al. "Clinical Decision-Making Variability Among Nurse Practitioners in the Early Detection and Management of Sepsis in Acute Care Settings." *International Journal of Medical Discoveries* Volume 2 (2026), no. Issue 1 (2025): . https://doi.org/10.64220/ijmd.v2i1.006